IPODR Logo [ CDPH Logo ]
Welcome to IPODR CDPH Home   CDPH Programs   CDPH Services     Health Information    Certificates & Licenses  Publications & Forms  CDPH Data     
Printer Friendly Version
Recent Changes to IPODR

IPODR Home
County Reports
Data Sources
Definitions
Help
Site Map/Index
Contact IPODR Support
Take IPODR User Survey

adobe reader free download

The Adobe Reader is required to view several documents contained on this website

Sponsored by the CDPH Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Program

IPODR - California County Profile Report

Imperial County, 2007

Cesarean Sections
Cesareans
Contents of This Page
 1. Introduction
 2. Definitions
 3. First Time Cesarean Sections
 4. Repeat Cesarean Sections
Introduction
According to the Healthy People 2010 Objectives,
"During the 1980s, rates of cesarean births rose steadily, with a peak rate of 25 percent of deliveries reported in 1988. Since then, the rate has been slowly decreasing, with the majority of the decline attributable to a reduction in the rates of primary cesarean births. In 1989, the rate of vaginal births among women who had a previous cesarean birth was 19 percent; in 1995 it increased to 28 percent.[Curtin, S.C. Rates of cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991–95. Monthly Vital Statistics Report 45(Suppl. 3)(11):1-12, 1997.] The improvements are likely to be attributable to use of such strategies as clearer guidelines for trials of labor and labor management, continual labor support, and focused attention on physician practice patterns.[Main, E.K. Reducing cesarean birth rates with data-driven quality improvement activities. Pediatrics 103:374-383, 1999. PubMed; PMID 9917479]

Expert opinion called for use of risk-adjusted rates of cesarean births (that is, rates standardized by patient characteristics) to monitor progress over time.[ACOG, Task Force on Cesarean Delivery. Considerations in Evaluating the Incidence of Cesarean Delivery. Washington DC: ACOG, in press] (The targets presented here apply to the population as a whole and are not intended to be used as practice outcome objectives for individual physicians or institutions, as the medical needs of the patients in each practice will vary.) In addition to monitoring rates of cesarean births, the outcomes of these deliveries (for both the mother and the infant) should be watched closely to assure that changes in the mode of delivery do not put women or their infants at risk."
The following table shows the Healthy People 2010 Objective for cesarean section outcomes:
Cesarean Section Rate2010 Objective
Low-Risk Women Giving Birth for the First Time 15.0
Low-Risk Women with a Prior Cesarean (i.e, Repeat Cesarean) 63.0
Source:
http://www.healthypeople.gov/Document/HTML/Volume1/09Family.htm
The California County Profile Reports include information on both first-time cesareans and repeat cesareans.
Definitions
A live birth is said to be delivered via first time cesarean section if the mother had no previous deliveries, and the delivery is low-risk.
A live birth is said to be delivered via repeat cesarean section if the delivery is low-risk, and the mother has previously delivered via cesarean.
A Low-Risk delivery is defined as one for a full-term (at least 37 weeks since LMP), singleton (not a multiple pregnancy), vertex fetus (head facing in a downward position in the birth canal).
Tables and Figures
Number and Percent of First Time Cesarean Sections by Race/Ethnicity, California and Imperial County, 2007
Race/Ethnicity Imperial CountyCalifornia
NDenominator%N All
Births
%
Hispanic 251     816     30.8     18,413     74,224     24.8    
Non-Hispanic White 27     79     34.2     12,921     49,857     25.9    
Non-Hispanic Black 7     10     70.0     2,207     7,590     29.1    
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander 3     8     37.5     6,158     23,587     26.1    
Non-Hispanic Other Race 3     3     100.0     1,672     6,481     25.8    
Overall 291     916     31.8     41,371     161,739     25.6    
Births with unknown values are not included
Categories with less than 10 live births are grayed
Source: California Department of Public Health (CDPH)
Percent of First Time Cesarean Sections, Imperial County, 2005-2007
 map FIRSTCSEC
Download as PDF
 Source: California Department of Public Health (CDPH)
Percent of First Time Cesarean Sections, California and Imperial County, 2005-2007
 trend FIRSTCSEC
Download as PDF
 Source: California Department of Public Health (CDPH)
Number and Percent of Repeat Cesarean Sections by Race/Ethnicity, California and Imperial County, 2007
Race/Ethnicity Imperial CountyCalifornia
NDenominator%N All
Births
%
Hispanic 401     402     99.8     28,315     29,778     95.1    
Non-Hispanic White 38     38     100.0     12,793     13,672     93.6    
Non-Hispanic Black 6     6     100.0     2,280     2,450     93.1    
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander 2     2     100.0     5,480     5,901     92.9    
Non-Hispanic Other Race 1     1     100.0     1,586     1,697     93.5    
Overall 448     449     99.8     50,454     53,498     94.3    
Births with unknown values are not included
Categories with less than 10 live births are grayed
Source: California Department of Public Health (CDPH)
Percent of Repeat Cesarean Sections, Imperial County, 2005-2007
 map RPTCSEC
Download as PDF
 Source: California Department of Public Health (CDPH)
Percent of Repeat Cesarean Sections, California and Imperial County, 2005-2007
 trend RPTCSEC
Download as PDF
 Source: California Department of Public Health (CDPH)

Back to Top of Page
© 2010 State of California | Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy